1. The Senkaku Islands are an inherent part of the territory of Japan in light of historical facts and based on international law – From 1885, surveys of the Senkaku Islands had been thoroughly conducted by the Government of Japan through the agencies of Okinawa Prefecture and by way of other methods. Through these surveys, […]
Материалы:
Опубликовано в 
Positions of Japan and Korea about Takeshima Islands
13/11/2012Position of Japan on Takeshima In light of the historical facts and based upon international law, Takeshima is an integral and inherent part of Japanese territory. There exists a territorial dispute over Takeshima with the Republic of Korea (ROK), and recently President Lee illegally set foot on Takeshima. The position of Japan is that we […]
October 26, 2012 – Round Table “Disputed territories in the Asia-Pacific Region: Past and Present”
9/11/2012On October 26, 2012 in the Far Eastern State University of Humanities took place a round table on “Disputed territories in the Asia-Pacific Region: Past and Present” organized by Asia Pacific International Relations Study Center. Leading experts on international Khabarovsk discussed the situation with the aggravation of the diplomatic and information struggle over disputed territories […]
Friendly ultimatum
29/10/2012From 13 August till 27 August, I had the opportunity to take part in the International Scientific Conference, held at Waseda University in Tokyo. The conference agenda was based on the most important theme for the Russian Far East: prospects for development of Russian-Japanese relations. How Japanese geopolitics represent the future of these relations? The […]
Results of the Summit are successful. Opposition upset and silent
21/10/2012On the eve of the APEC Summit in the media and in blogs spread a lot of lies. Results of the Summit was very successful for Russia – this is recognized even by attributed Opponents. Let us examine carefully two blends that enemies of our prosperity country tried to gullible readers. Greater lie number one: […]
September 7, 2012 – Round table: “Problems of the study of international relations in the Asia-Pacific region”
11/10/2012Far East State University of Humanitiesand the Asia-Pacific International Relations Study Center on September 7th held round table: “Problems of the study of international relations in the Asia-Pacific region.” The meeting was held at the conference hall of the Far Eastern State University of Humanities. The round table was attended by leading scholars in international […]
September 21, 2012 – Meeting of APIR Center with “Association of former residents of Chishima province and Habomai Islands”
11/10/2012On September 26, 2012 in the conference hall of the Far Eastern State University of Humanities took place a meeting of representatives of the Asia Pacific Study Center with the delegation of the public organization “Association of former residents of Chishima province and Habomai Islands” (Japan). Japanese side was represented by the deputy chairman of […]
Valery Timoshenko – Territorial disputes involving China and the United States’ position
11/10/2012Recently United States pay close attention to the issues of territorial claims in the Asia-Pacific region. In July 2009, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the U.S. Senate held hearings on the issue of territorial disputes in the Asia-Pacific region and the United States’ role in the resolution of these disputes. The hearing was led […]
The Russian Kurile Islands and the Japanese appetites
27/09/2012By Adzhar Kurtov Adzhar Kurtov is the leading scientific employee of the Russian Institute of Strategic Researches, the candidate of historical sciences. Japan, using the former miscounts of the USSR, and then and of Yeltsin Russia, aspires to review of the results of the World War II. The campaign for the return of the Kurile […]
A Card play with devils
24/09/2012By Sergey Konstantinov The majority of our European partners had a blast, discussing the anniversary of the beginning of the World War II, especially in criticism of the actions of our country. Whether it is necessary to reply to the frank distortion of the historic facts? It costs but not in the logic «you are […]